What about NET NEUTRALITY--set to be de-Obamanized this month?

What about NET NEUTRALITY--set to be de-Obamanized this month?

Who do you believe?

Had a conversation with a relative who is a cybernet insider and believes it could backfire,

BUT listened to an interview today with an Internet Provider in Rural Pennsylvania who is a local entrepreneur with updated technology--sort of hybrid wireless fiber-net with about 1500 customers who pay for the bare bones wi-fi with the best of equipment, rare breakdowns and a price that beats the cable guys, 4K Cell providers and most others with speeds like you see in the Photo that themes this page and he said the worst part of Net neutrality would to force all IP's to go under the PUC and then pay all the exorbitant fees that other companies under the PUC require--such as landline phones (we had a landline with bare bones service, which was $14/month, but the fees, fed charges taxes were $14 so we paid $28 a month of practically nothing--and just fees to the various levels of government. The service and upkeep of the infrastructure was terrible. We haven't had it for years and don't miss it.)

So this IP in Rural PA says that reversing the part of Net Neurtality that would impose these 40% fees on Rural Internet subscribers UNDER A PUC WOULD ONLY BENEFIT THE LARGE COMPANIES SUCH AS VERIZON, AT&T, T MOBILE, ETC, and suffocate the "little guy" --the local operator/owner who can provide the best for the least because of not being burdened with so much overhead and fees.

Here are some links to chew on:
https://www.politico.com/…/20/net-neutrality-repeal-fcc-251…
http://reason.com/…/2…/11/21/ajit-pai-net-neutrality-podcast