Search This Blog

Thursday, October 25, 2018

'Twisted' fibre optic light breakthrough could make internet 100 times faster

 NOTE--this describes the old style "wired" fibernet--in the Australia--still fibernet and copper to the home--pretty obsolete in this country.

See the original article here--
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/oct/24/twisted-fibre-optic-light-breakthrough-could-make-internet-100-times-faster

Researchers say they have developed tiny readers that can detect information in light spirals
Researchers from RMIT say they have developed a detector the width of a human hair to replace existing dining table-sized readers. 
A new development in fibre optics could make internet speeds up to 100 times faster – by detecting light that has been twisted into a spiral.
The research, published in the journal Nature Communications, can be used to easily upgrade existing networks and significantly boost efficiency, scientists say.
Fibre optic cables use pulses of light to transmit information, but currently information can only be stored through the colour of the light, and whether the wave is horizontal or vertical.
By twisting light into a spiral, engineers effectively create a third dimension for light to carry information: the level of orbital angular momentum, or spin. “It’s like DNA, if you look at the double helix spiral,” said Min Gu from RMIT University. “The more you can use angular momentum the more information you can carry.”
Researchers in the US had previously created a fibre that could twist light, but Gu’s team is the first to create a reasonable-size detector that can read the information it holds.
Previous detectors were “the size of a dining table”, but the new detector is the width of a human hair. “We could produce the first chip that could detect this twisting and display it for mobile application,” Gu said.
The technology could be used to upgrade fibre optic networks like Australia’s national broadband network – although controversy still dogs the decision to reduce the scheme’s use of fibre optics in favour of copper wire.
NBN Co is on schedule to complete the network by 2020. However, the rollout represents a downgrade on the initial plan – put forward by Labor – that would have installed fibre optic cables directly into homes (known as fibre to the premises).
Instead, many households have received fibre to the node – which is cheaper but produces slower speeds. For fibre to the node, optic fibre cable only runs as far as a central point in the neighbourhood, and copper wire connects that node to each home.
Original ADSL connections use an average of 2.5km of copper wire per connection, fibre to the node uses 500 metres, fibre to the curb uses 30 metres, and fibre-to-the-premises uses none.
In January, NBN Co admitted that three out of four customers with fibre-to-the-node would not be able to access the NBN’s top speed tier.
The CEO, Stephen Rue, revealed plans to increase the number of premises with fibre to the curb, which uses less copper than fibre-to-the-node.
Gu said his new research could still work with networks with large amounts of copper wire.
“We will definitely reduce this hurdle,” he said. “We will make this transfer more efficient.”
However, because the new cables are required to effectively twist light, any upgrade could involve replacing existing fibre networks.
By 2020, NBN Co estimates that 4.6m homes will have fibre to the node, 1.4m will have fibre to the curb, and 2m will have fibre to the premises.
A spokesman said the network was “prepared for future demand”, but advances like those demonstrated at RMIT would need further acceptance before they were operationally ready.
“New communications technologies are continually being tested in labs many years in advance of being commercialised. They require widespread acceptance from equipment manufacturers and network operators before they are ready for operational deployment.”

Monday, October 8, 2018

UPDATE to Ooma Phone System (Internet based) from 20 Feb 2018--911 Test and Special 4 DAY Price

So, I found a great buy on the Ooma at Costco -- with built-in Wi-Fi and a handset--it's a relatively good deal at $89.  Go to https://www.costco.com/.product.100404941.html?&EMID=B2C_2018_1008_4DaysOnly

 BUT 4 DAYS ONLY--ENDS OCTOBER 11--that's WEDNESDAY!!!

Ooma had a learning curve and has a few idiosyncrasies but all in all has been reliable (more so than the previous AT&T Base station and much less expensive).  When our very reliable and advanced Rural internet system has an outage (very infrequently and doesn't last long) we use a T Mobile Hotspot which is really useless for most internet--except mobile--usage.  It has perhaps 9 mBs Download and has deteriorated to barely 1 mbs Upload--so be aware of the future of all these 4G cellular hot spots.  We use it only as a backup also due to high cost of monthly usage and cap on usage is insanely low--but so is AT&T, Verizon, etc.

911 TEST:  Due to a neighbor's issues with using 911 with a cell phone, decided to test the Ooma, and our 2 smartphones as to whether  or how fast they connected to 911 and showed our correct phone number and location to the 911 Operator in our County.

We were pleasantly surprised at these results:

Ooma with our backup T Mobile hot spot--after a number of rings, reached County Emergency system--reported back the correct phone number and location (Oooma also sends emails for 911 alerts) 

Oooma with our regular Broadband Wi-Fi service--After fewer rings than with the T Mobile Hotspot, also reached the County Emergency system, which reported back the correct phone number and location as above.

AT&T Samsung Smart Phone--after several rings (fewer than with the Ooma), reached 911 County Emergency operator who reported back correct phone number and same location as above.

T Mobile LG smartphone--after only 1 ring, reached the correct 911 County Emergency operator who reported back correct phone number and location.

 This needs to be qualified by not knowing whether we would get the same results in another location away from home, as sure that cell tower pings, etc may affect location, etc.  

Phones themselves seem to make a difference (brand, settings). Ooma is portable, but prefer not to have to take a bulky Ooma, home phone along when more compact cell phones do the same thing--including calls on wi-fi.  

We rarely use our prepaid cell phones at home and when on the road and take the T Mobile Hotspot (we were grandfathered into the $10/month for 2 gB) and use the Ooma app, Hangouts, Google phone to make calls).  Guess what!  We pay less than $50/year for the prepaid Cell usage--both phones!

 

 

5G Network Uses Same EMF Waves as Pentagon Crowd Control System

5G Network Uses Same EMF Waves as Pentagon Crowd Control System



By Terrence Newton
The global rollout of 5G is well underway, and we soon may see new small cell towers near all schools, on every residential street, dispersed throughout the natural environment, and pretty much everywhere. But the safety of this technology is in serious question, and there is a raging battle to stop the taxpayer funded implementation of 5G.

The new cell network uses high-band radio frequency millimeter waves to deliver high bandwidth data to any device within line of sight.
Today’s cellular and Wi-Fi networks rely on microwaves – a type of electromagnetic radiation utilizing frequencies up to 6 gigahertz (GHz) in order to wirelessly transmit voice or data. However, 5G applications will require unlocking of new spectrum bands in higher frequency ranges above 6 GHz to 100 GHz and beyond, utilizing submillimeter and millimeter waves – to allow ultra-high rates of data to be transmitted in the same amount of time as compared with previous deployments of microwave radiation. [Source]
One of the ways 5G will enable this is by tapping into new, unused bands at the top of the radio spectrum. These high bands are known as millimeter waves (mmwaves), and have been recently been opened up by regulators for licensing. They’ve largely been untouched by the public, since the equipment required to use them effectively has typically been expensive and inaccessible. [Source]
Among the many potential problems with exposure to 5G radio waves are issues with the skin, which is interesting when you consider that this technology is already being used in the military for crowd control purposes.
This kind of technology, which is in many of our homes, actually interacts with human skin and eyes. The shocking finding was made public via Israeli research studies that were presented at an international conference on the subject last year. Below you can find a lecture from Dr. Ben-Ishai of the Department of Physics at Hebrew University. He goes through how human sweat ducts act like a number of helical antennas when exposed to these wavelengths that are put out by the devices that employ 5G technology. [Source]
The U.S. military developed a non-lethal crowd control weapon system called the Active Denial System (ADS). It uses radio frequency millimeter waves in the 95GHz range to penetrate the top 1/64 of an inch layer of skin on the targeted individual, instantly producing an intolerable heating sensation that causes them to flee.

This video demonstrates: Go to https://youtu.be/KEhmFp-Gvyc

This technology is becoming ubiquitous in top world militaries, demonstrating how genuinely effective this radio frequency energy can be at causing harm to humans and anything else.
U.S., Russian, and Chinese defense agencieshave been active in developing weapons that rely on the capability of this electromagnetic technology to create burning sensations on the skin, for crowd control. The waves are Millimetre waves, also used by the U.S. Army in crowd dispersal guns called Active Denial Systems. [Source]

Final Thoughts

The fight over 5G is heating up at the community level, and awareness of this important issue is spreading fast. For more background on 5G, watch this video from Take Back Your Power, featuring Tom Wheeler, Former FCC Chairman and corporate lobbyist, who delivers a rather intimidating and presumptuous speech praising this new technology. The fight over 5G is heating up at the community level, though, and now is the time to speak out against it.

SEE THIS VIDEO: https://youtu.be/OMxfffqyDtc

Read more articles from Terence Newton.
Terence Newton is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com, interested primarily with issues related to science, the human mind, and human consciousness.
This article (5G Network Uses Same EMF Waves as Pentagon Crowd Control System) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Terence Newton and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.

Friday, October 5, 2018

Rural Broadband Hearing Link for Oct 4 Thune Hearing in DC

253 Russell
U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) chairman of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, will convene a hearing titled “Broadband: Opportunities and Challenges in Rural America,”at 10:00 a.m. on October 4, 2018. This hearing allows the Committee, as part of its ongoing efforts, to assess the progress of broadband deployment in rural America and continue to explore ways in which closing the digital divide will benefit American jobs and the economy.
Witnesses:

  • Mr. Godfrey Enjady, General Manager, Mescalero Apache Telecom, Inc.
  • Mr. Denny Law, General Manager and CEO, Golden West Telecommunications
  • Ms. Mona Thompson, General Manager, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Telephone Authority
  • Mr. Grant Spellmeyer, Vice President, Federal Affairs and Public Policy, U.S. Cellular Corp.
*Witness list subject to change.
Hearing Details:
Thursday, October 4, 2018
10:00 a.m.
Full Committee 

This hearing will take place in Russell Senate Office Building, Room 253. Witness testimony, opening statements, and a live video of the hearing will be available on www.commerce.senate.gov.



Witness Panel 1


Thursday, October 4, 2018

POSTPONED: Thune Hearing Friday Oct 5 on Fastest Internet in the World For Sioux Falls

  UPDATE: The Friday October 5 Hearing has been POSTPONED!!!!!!!!!!!



PLEASE FELLOW Rural Residents--we can't go to the hearing, so please flood John Thune's office with Emails asking for another hearing JUST ON RURAL BROADBAND OPTIONS that are available NOW!   Please copy and paste this entire article into an Email to your FRIENDS TOMORROW.  The hearing is Friday, October 5.

CONTACT JUNE THUNE at https://www.thune.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact


MY TAKE ON THIS:  As a Rural Broadband customer (if I still had SC, would by end of 2018 be a NON-customer as will be a number of neighbors in our township and county, when it pulls out of the rural area with no information on any other service prepared to step in at that time).

Mr Thune--this will be great for Sioux Falls, but are there not many more residents of rural SD than inside SIoux Falls that need some type of promise for the future.  Recent news of the Halo-net (sponsered through, I believe, Midco and NBS and supported by Microsoft--low orbit satellites but not for a couple of years) we are told will be limited to extreme SE South Dakota which is not in the SpeedConnect area being abandoned, some of which does have some alternatives, but again, like electric power--even if 80% countryside covered, how can the other 20% go back into the dark ages of kerosene lamps.

Telco's can't cover this effectively or economically for the customer--again $5000 to run CL COPPER (NOT FIBER NET) from a Fibernet Node 3/4 mile from us on roads with 6 to 9 customers at the north and south boundaries, and yet about 6 not included in their rollout  which right now requires $5000 for us to get now obsolete and very slow copper link to the Fibernet.

Taken from original article at
https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/2018/09/28/john-thune-5-g-senate-commerce-committee-sioux-falls-could-get-fastest-internet-service-world/1455942002/










Sioux Falls could be a test case for how the country deploys a new network that promises the fastest Internet speeds in the world.
Sen. John Thune, the chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, will hold a Commerce Committee hearing in Sioux Falls next Friday that will include Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr, Sioux Falls Mayor Paul TenHaken, industry representatives and the president of Dakota State University, Thune announced Friday.
Known as 5G mobile broadband technology, the network is capable of delivering speeds that are 100 times faster than current networks. Communities with 5G technology would be poised for a big boost in economic development.
“It means more opportunities, more jobs, and more economic development,” Thune wrote in a weekly column. “According to some estimates, 5G could contribute hundreds of millions of dollars to the U.S. economy.”
“As chairman of the Commerce Committee,” he added, “I want to help the United States win this race, and I want South Dakota to be at the forefront.”
Next week’s hearing will focus on the hurdles that states and local communities face. At a national level, Thune has introduced legislation to streamline 5G development. At a White House 5G summit on Friday, Thune identified a major hurdle: spectrum.
“But if America’s wireless carriers do not have enough of the right kinds of spectrum available, Americans simply won’t have the speed and connections we need,” Thune said at the summit.
Sioux Falls is already poised to be a laboratory for 5G. A couple of years ago, the city updated its ordinances on small cell service, said T.J. Nelson, a spokesman for TenHaken. The city currently has an internal task force working with industry providers to negotiate details, including policies regarding fees and easements.
“Our goal is to be one of the first, if not the first, mid-population cities in the U.S.,” Nelson said.
Correction: A previous version of this story misidentified Brendan Carr's title. He is a commissioner of the FCC. 
Midco launches its Xstream Gig internet service in Sioux Falls, its first market for the super-fast internet speed in South Dakota. The service is about 35 times as fast as regular internet speeds. Wochit



Wednesday, October 3, 2018

Third Wave of Cord Cutting: Home Internet Service

From Fortune magazine

Here Comes the Third Wave of Cord Cutting: Home Internet Service

People are increasingly relying on their phones to get online, and cutting the cord to home broadband Internet service. 
The trend of people cutting their home Internet connections in favor of wireless online connectivity is accelerating, according to the latest survey from Pew Research. No doubt fed by falling prices for wireless service and the spread of unlimited data plans, Internet cord cutting has now reached one in five Americans, almost double the level of two years ago.

The percentage of people who say they depend solely on their smartphones to connect to the Internet has risen steadily from 8% in 2013, to 12% in 2016, to 20% this year. Pew first highlighted the trend in 2015 when it recorded that the percentage of households with home Internet connections declined to 67% from 70% in 2013. That measure has since bounced around a bit, but stood at 65% in the latest survey from 2018, Pew reported.

[ HOWEVER, who knows how this survey was taken--to skew results to show what the Wireless TelCos need to justify their 40 million government grants???? 

I would say--look closer--aging Baby boomers are entering retirement--fixed incomes but more leisure time to stream 4K (eyesight fails--need larger crisper displays) at home and not on the go with small screens size of a smart phone or tablet--uh, uh.  

Yes, some have smartphone plans shared with their kids, but often for travel or emergency or economic self-budgeting on fixed incomes requiring uninstalling landlines which services are similar in price but not portable.  

And as the aging population increases--who not only have fixed retirement incomes but less disposable income due to continued health cost increases by Obama style premiums--limiting budget items such as smartphones with unlimited data plans--may give way to faster streaming bandwidth for leisure TV watching or hobbies needing a regular PC with large monitor....  Everybody gets older, wiser, blinder and home bound...

What about large families--6 people with their own smartphones sitting in corners somewhere vs family-oriented TV viewing????? Do the math on that one...]

The trend marks the third wave of cord cutting over the past few decades. In the first wave of cord cutting, people dropped their landline phone connections, starting around 2003, in favor of more convenient wireless connections. Almost 54% of households have only wireless phone service now, according to the most recent survey by National Center for Health Statistics.


Saturday, September 15, 2018

Microsoft is rolling out a rural broadband plan — BUT

Microsoft is rolling out a rural broadband plan — but the Iowa counties that benefit aren't rural

 https://amp.desmoinesregister.com/amp/1284298002

Microsoft is partnering with Network Business Systems to expand internet service to some 126,700 people who do not have broadband service. But the three counties in Iowa that will benefit — Scott, Muscatine and Clinton — are urban.
"They’re not rural," said David Peters, an associate professor of sociology at Iowa State University.

Microsoft is partnering with the Geneseo, Illinois, company as part of its Airband initiative, which seeks to expand broadband service to 2 million people living in rural America by 2022.
Rural residents have long suffered from unequal access to high-speed internet. Providers often avoid the most remote areas because of unfavorable economics: They demand a high infrastructure investment, but smaller population bases offer limited potential.
FCC data show that about 98 percent of Iowans in urban areas have access to high-speed internet. Conversely, only 77.4 percent of rural residents have broadband access.
 
A Microsoft spokeswoman later said the tech giant is "investing in technology and expertise as well as digital literacy skills training." The agreement also allows Network Business Systems to leverage Microsoft’s suite of products including Azure, Office 365, and Dynamics.
Network Business Systems already was considering expanding its territory, but the Microsoft pact "kind of sealed the deal for us," Hoffman said.
The provider uses wireless towers to beam internet service across remote stretches of Iowa and Illinois. The company uses a mix of technology, including utilizing television white space, the unused portion of television airwaves. 
Network Business Systems operates 120 towers and frequently partners with farmers to place receivers on top of grain bins. Each tower can transmit five to seven miles, she said.
That avoids the high cost of laying fiberoptic wire to connect remote areas. But the technology is still unfamiliar to many, so having Microsoft's backing should help persuade customers, Hoffman said.
 
She said Network Business Systems works with farms, businesses and homeowners, specializing in connecting rural areas.
"We want to get it to the underserved, first and foremost," she said. "That's what our company started with."
 
⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫⧫

[This is the same offer extended to Iowa, Illinois and South Dakota published in the Argus Leader a few days ago -- https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/business-journal/2018/09/13/microsoft-corporation-improve-internet-rural-south-dakota/1290942002/

The companies announced their partnership Thursday, with plans to expand broadband access in Iowa, Illinois and South Dakota. The improvements will help an estimated 126,700 get better internet.
The company is partnering with Microsoft is part of Microsoft’s Airband Initiative, a national effort to extend broadband access across the rural U.S.
Microsoft plans to improve coverage for 2 million people by July, 2022.

OUR PUC has further clarified that those in SD wil probably be the extreme SE corner of SD.

 Again: see the highlighted key words and what that REALLY means for you and your neighbors!

Looks good on paper in  some beaurocrat's office, but is 126,700 -- households or people--there could be 4-6 in a Rural household and so the actual farms getting the services might be 30,000+--????????

 

Monday, September 10, 2018

SPEEDCONNECT LEAVING SOUTH DAKOTA CONFIRMED



Confirmed via our PUC: Speed Connect leaving SD

Last week the FCC announced that Midco was the winning bidder to receive a subsidy for providing broadband in many of the very high cost rural CenturyLink areas in South Dakota.  A chunk of the Flandreau exchange is included in that coverage.  My understanding is that Midco will use a new generation fixed wireless product (up to 100 mbps) to meet their obligation.  It’s possible some of that coverage may serve part of your area but it is way too early in that process to know.  

This will NOT happen this year.

South Dakota Broadband Report Released August 2018

 SDN recently published a blog report on South Dakota "Rural S.D. “ahead of curve” in deploying broadband services"   Posted on Tuesday, August 21, 2018 in Broadband Internet , Member CommunitiesBlog written by


2018 report is titled, “Connecting South Dakota’s Future: A Report on the Deployment & Impact of Rural Broadband.” The South Dakota Dashboard, an online community information service, compiled the report for the South Dakota Telecommunications Association and SDN Communications.

To download and view the entire report, go to
https://sdncommunications.com/media/files/Docs/SD-Broadband-Report-2018.pdf

Outtakes:

"According to a recent study, South Dakota ranked 35th in the nation for average or mean download speeds at 17.38 MB, compared to number one Rhode Island with an average speed
of 36.69 MB and Maine in 50th place with an average of 11.73 MB. In practical terms, this means that it takes roughly twice as long (59 minutes) to download a large, high-definition movie (7.5 GB) in South Dakota than Rhode Island.23"


SPARSITY AND DISTANCE: THE CHALLENGES WE FACE
South Dakota is a big, geographically diverse state. In some areas, especially western South Dakota, companies have to traverse great distances with wirelines and signals to ensure that all citizens are served. Because the costs to serve rural customers are higher and the benefits of a telecommunications network that is able to reach everyone accrue to all customers, the federal
government collects fees from telecommunications companies and customers throughout the country to assist with network investments and provide affordable “universal service.”

This Universal Service Fund (USF) provides resources to help telecommunications companies deliver services to locations in high cost areas, reduce the cost of telecommunications services for low-income households, increase access to telemedicine and rural health programs, and connect schools and libraries to the internet.
Because non-metropolitan telecommunications providers serve a smaller and relatively more dispersed customer base, they also incur higher costs per line. Resources provided by USF help play a critical role in keeping telecommunications affordable in rural communities. Across the country, total expenditures for the four USF programs totaled $8.75 billion in 2016.31 Of this total, telecommunications companies in South Dakota received nearly $100 million. [What!  With all that $ and we have neighbors -- within a mile or two (7-8 households) who cannot get this service--we are told we need to pay $5000 to run a copper line from a node 3/4 mile up to the corner to get this "TELCO" service.  Why isn't this $ available to NON-Phone Internet services who can do it faster, cheaper and sooner!!!!!!]

Rural communities in South Dakota also receive support from the US Department of Agriculture’s Rural Utilities Service (RUS), which provides loans, loan guarantees, and grants to help build telecommunications infrastructure. Between 2010 and 2017, broadband infrastructure investments in service areas of SDTA member companies financed through the RUS totaled $122.5 million. This included $93.4 million in loans under the Telecommunications Infrastructure Program and another $26.2 million in grants and loans provided under the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act’s Broadband Investment Program. South Dakota companies have been particularly enterprising in taking advantage of available RUS funding. In FY 2017, approved RUS loans to South Dakota’s rural telecommunications carriers totaled $116.7 million and accounted for 17 percent of all dollars allocated nationally under the related RUS programs.

Meeting the Challenges
In 2011, Venture Communications began upgrading infrastructure with fiber-optics-to-the-home technology. Areas that were addressed initially included the Wessington Springs, Faulkton, Highmore, and Harrold communities which had some of the most antiquated plants. Six years later, by the end of 2017, Venture had replaced old copper plant with fiber optics for more than 95 percent of its customers. [Takes time IF the Telco is even willing to take fiber directly to the home and not use older existing copper lines which dumbs down the speed significantly] According to Venture Communications spokesperson Rod Kusser, the company’s fiber-to-the-home program gives customers far more options when it comes to download speeds and
services. “In many areas customers can choose an offering that approaches gigabyte speeds,” says Kusser. For year-round rural customers, fiber-based broadband provides a vital connection for
information, entertainment, and communications. For customers who summer on the lakes in the northeastern part of the state or along the Missouri River, they can work remotely with broadband
service that often exceeds what they get in their offices in major metropolitan areas.95% of Venture
customers have been converted to fiber.


Here's the entire News Conference regarding that report :


South Dakota Broadband Report News Conference

My take on this is that it's great there is some media attention to a problem that has existed for quite awhile and most of the solutions aren't going to be available in the next few months--lucky if in the next few years.  

BUT, like electricity -- if 25% of rural SD did not have electricity????

Rural water--there IS an alternative--called wells (so if there were a similar alternative for broadband, we could survive until Rural water became affordable and available to all). 

AND it's about choice--if you carve up certain areas so that --- sure there is broadband available, so check that off for a certain township, but what is the cost, what are the data limits, what is the "outage" history?  We don't just want what someone in DC "thinks" we need or want.  We want the same choices our urban neighbors have.

See post from DesMoines Register on a new system that was announced a year ago about Microsoft and low orbit satellites, TV air waves.  Sounds good, but when?  Not this year, when SpeedConnect abandons thousands of customers, not just in SD but everywhere but Michigan! 

Tuesday, September 4, 2018

SPEEDCONNECT to DROP ALL Internet Service (except in Michigan) by end of 2018

A SpeedConnect Employee emailed me yesterday (will be confirming via other reliable sources) that SC will only be offering ViaSat Satellite Internet in Michigan for Michigan only customers.  All other customers in the rest of the US will lose all types of Internet service from SC by end of 2018.

This is a change from what customers were told in their bills that ViaSat service would be provided via SC.  

BIG question as to who will pick up the customers?????

Monday, September 3, 2018

What Is Net Neutrality?

WATCH THIS 5 Minute VIDEO on Net Neutrality



CLICK to WATCH




 What Is Net Neutrality?
For months, it seemed nearly every media figure was in hysterics over the impending repeal of net neutrality. Then, net neutrality was repealed… and nothing much changed. So what exactly is net neutrality, and why do so many people have such strong opinions about something they don’t understand? Jon Gabriel, editor-in-chief of Ricochet.com cuts through the hysteria to bring you the facts.

Monday, April 23, 2018

SOMETHING More Alarming and Critical than having slow Internet is having NO INTERNET--EMP in our FUTURE

Here's a very professional interview from Fox News with Peter Pry about the Threat of an EMP -- not just from an enemy (and we have plenty of them) cyberattack in the atmosphere which we would HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO WARNING OF WHEN IT HAPPENS--except the immediate and long-term effects which could disable or kill 90% of our population, not directly but by the effect on infrastructure, communication (internet), transportation.  

I have heard from my geek sons that it could be quite isolated and not widespread, but listen to this interview to see how an EMP could be MADE more widespread. It talks of a combination of attacks that could disable that 90% very easily.

EMP doesn't just come from man but also from the SUN!

See this Youtube replay of the interview Sunday night: https://youtu.be/vjB_ECh37Cs

  • Time to take stock of what's important to you to preserve, stock up and protect. 
  • Your cars have computers--do you know anyone with an old klunker that does NOT use a computer--Be friends of them real quick.
  • Do you know a Ham Operator as how else will you communicate--what do cell towers use? Or where do Landlines get their feeds?
  • Your internet provider or source?
  • Your water supply? Your waste system?
  • Your heat supply?
  • You can't depend on your survivalist neighbor as you may not be able to get to him and be sure he will have defense (guns) ready if he thinks you DON'T have the same set up he does.
  • What about your family who lives in the city and you are in a rural area?

 

UPDATE on SPEEDCONNECT....sort of

We understand SpeedConnect has some new comments on the FCC website to this effect:



"SpeedConnect will continue to provide high speed internet service to  its subscribers after  the sale of its 2.5  GHz  spectrum to Clearwire Spectrum Holdings III LLC through Viasat, Inc., a  satellite provider of which SpeedConnect is a registered dealer. Once the parties have determined  a closing date, SpeedConnect will contact its customers  with first notice by mail at least thirty  days prior to the switch over, followed up by contact
 through telephone and electronic mail to  best reach each customer.  

 SpeedConnect will offer the Viasat service as an alternative to its  current service at the best possible rate.

 Thereafter, SpeedConnect’s customers will have the option of continuing their relationship with SpeedConnect or
 may transition  to other providers in  their respective markets  for their internet services
  

This means that the FCC has approved sale of SC's 2.5 Spectrum to Clearwire for use of Sprint's cell system, NOT FIXED WIRELESS--that will be GONE!  

Customer's ONLY choice will then be Satellite unless a new Provider pops up.  We have at least one neighbor close by who seems to have already made that transition and hope to catch him and see how it's working. If the prices on this site are the best we can do, good luck!  https://www.speedconnect.com/plans/